paoper

yay new page! =)

Hoolighanja

Bleh, I already predicted the alliance would win the Crossroads >>

• Frizzlecrank: Spoiler lover >.>

darkeneye

why cause the alliance is so good
and the horde so teri-baaaaaad?

• Frizzlecrank: The alliance had 50 warriors and 250 rogues.
  It explains it all.

kolobuhin

And where da trolls, mon?

• mattwo: Yea, and the night elves?
  
  I think I saw a blood elf on the alliance side ._.
• Frizzlecrank: Nah,it was a dwarf with yellow hair and beard.
  
  On the other side.. night elves are sad because a butterfly died and the trolls are too occupied restoring the Whining Caverns..

Frizzlecrank

Okay. Now,tell me the odds of finding the new pages EXACTLY while you were browsing old Glads comics..

• Mofasa: 2/325= 0.00615384615

J. Ason

I like how the alliance are sounding like a mix of greedy, power hungry feudal lords, ravaging colonializers, and industrialization-era economic and political leaders that ruin the land and expend all its resources in the name of short-sighted "progress". It feels more real than how they are portrayed in warcraft, even though there's some corruption and greed going on there too.

• mattwo: And the orcs are bunch of idiotic savages. Seems about right.
• nielspeterdejong: Yet in Cataclysm it's actually the Orcs, Goblins, and the rest of the Horde that does those things ^^; Seems a bit ironic to me for the author to make this connection to the Alliance after playing Cata ;p

Yinello

Oh I love the top panel, it would make an awesome wallpaper.

Interesting how the Dwarves believe their union with the others must keep existing. Unless their ulterior motive is archeology. :P

I've never believed in the my side good, other side bad thing. Whenever I see people fighting over which faction is the best I roll my eyes because they're exactly the same.

• nielspeterdejong: Except in Cataclysm the Horde has become more aggressive due to Garrosh, as well as a little more morally black due to Sylvanas. This might change though, with both Ally and Horde storming Orgrimmar.
• Yinello: True. I found the Garrosh thing interesting because it led to conflict inside the Horde, just like how Moira also gave conflict inside the alliance. I love inner circle politics. xD Sylvanas made me supersad though - before Cata I saw her as this wise undead leader who wanted to secure a place where her people can be safe. Now suddenly she's this power-hungry person who wants everyone to suffer as she does. It feels like such a personality breaker.
• DarkruneDK: Well... She always wanted Arthas to suffer, so it isn't so far for her to want people to suffer, but on the other side, she wanted revenge that time, for what Arthas had did to her.
  
  In my eyes, Sylvanas had never been some one you could rely on. It's just a matter of time, before she will stab someone in the back :-P.
• Yinello: Heh. Then you were a better judge of character than I was. xP
• Frizzlecrank: Sylvanas doesn't want to make other people suffer. Nor the Forsaken do.
  
  They're a broken people,their lives destroyed by the Scourge just to be reanimated as undead monsters. And when they finally got freed,they remembered of their horrors,thus wanting to ultimately kill Arthas. Now that he's dead,they just want to 'revive' Lordareon and use it as the capital of their undead empire.
  
  Not counting that the newly-ressurrected Forsaken can simply choose to die again after being revived.. though most do not.

deathzard2

kinda lost its magic when teh gladiators ended :/